Tampax Pearl Tampons
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they contain lead
In July 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for, among other things, allegedly deceptively marketing Tide Pods laundry detergent as a detergent, stain remover, and brightener without adequately disclosing that the pods cause permanent blue/purple stains on white and light colored laundry. (Guariglia et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC, Case No. 15-cv-4307, E. D. NY.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Procter & Gamble and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they contain lead
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain lead
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as safe to use when they leak and cause damage to cars
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as 100% organic
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Tampax Pure Cotton Tampons
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain enough detergent to wash 32 loads of laundry
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as organic and natural
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising products as “Free of Dyes”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as non-drowsy when they contain an ingredient that causes drowsiness
Allegations: Falsely advertising the accuracy of ovulation test kits
Allegations: Falsely marketing the percentage of natural ingredients in products
Allegations: Marketing products as healthy and safe without disclosing that they contain dangerous amounts of lead
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as safe and providing various health benefits
Allegations: Falsely advertising that toothpaste will repair gums
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the toothpastes repair gums
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that toothpastes will repair damaged gums and enamel
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that toothpaste will repair damaged gums and enamel
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat congestion and other cold and flu symptoms
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products relieve nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines are decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing the products treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as if they alleviate cold and flu symptoms when fine print on the side of the product packaging discloses that the products are “not intended to…
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products using the phrase “Pro-Health” when testing shows they likely contain chemicals that are harmful to humans and the environment
Allegations: Falsely marketing medicines as decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing medicines as nasal decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat congestion and other cold and flu symptoms
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines relieve nasal decongestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing medicines as decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing medicines as decongestants
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal decongestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing medicine as “non-drowsy” when an ingredient causes drowsiness
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion and other sinus issues
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal decongestant
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal decongestion
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the amount of melatonin in supplements
Allegations: Misleadingly using the word “Nature” and images of an avocado and a green leaf to make consumers believe products are natural when they actually contain non-natural ingredients
Allegations: Misrepresenting that products are safe and effective without disclosing that they may explode and spew detergent into the air due to a defect
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the product contains enough detergent to wash 107 loads
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as if they are specifically formulated for children when they contain the same formulation as adult versions
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing laundry detergents as if they are beneficial for the environment
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as plant based
Allegations: Falsely marketing the detergent as “plant based” when it contains ingredients that come from petroleum
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “100% organic cotton” and being “the best of science & nature”
Allegations: Falsely and misleadingly marketing Vicks VapoCool Severe Honey Lemon Chill
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the product contains enough detergent for 64 loads of laundry
Allegations: Falsely marketing that toothbrushes whiten teeth when they don’t
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products help support “Healthy Blood Sugar Levels,” “Appetite Control,” and “Digestive Health” when scientific evidence shows they don’t
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Products contain fewer paper towels than advertised
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as pure
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products “eliminate[] odors” when they do not
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain a carcinogen
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing charcoal toothpastes as safe, gentle, whitening, and healthy when they pose safety risks and are abrasive
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing diapers as plant-based when more of the content comes from petroleum than from plants
Allegations: Failing to timely disclose that warranties are conditioned upon using authorized repair services and replacement parts
Allegations: Failing to disclose chips contain harmful ingredients and misleadingly marketing chips as containing evaporated cane juice when they actually contain sugar
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing medicines as “non-drowsy” when an ingredient in them causes drowsiness
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising the amount of time Duracell LED flashlights provide light and the lifespan of the flashlights while in storage
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing shampoos as plant-based and natural by using the phrase “Real Botanicals” and the Royal Botanical Gardens Kew seal on the bottles
July 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. For more information, go to http://www.belfiorewipesettlement.com/. March 2020: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement in which…
In May 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Procter & Gamble Company for allegedly misleadingly marketing Frebreze Car Vent Clips as lasting for up to 30 days, “safe…
January 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. February 2017: A class-action…
April 2019: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. November 2018: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that would provide class members with monetary and…
March 2018: This case was consolidated with another similar lawsuit pending in Alabama, Jones v. Coty, Inc. (Case No. 16-cv-622, S. D. AL.) February 2018: This case was transferred to…
August 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-6844, C.D. Cal.) April 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly misleadingly using You…
January 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. October 2017: A class-action…
April 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. December 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for April…
A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Procter and Gamble Company for allegedly misleadingly marketing that Ivory® Dish Detergent is “gentle on hands” and “designed to have mild, long-lasting suds”…
December 2017: The parties informed the Court that they reached a settlement agreement and anticipate filing a stipulation to dismiss the case. The terms of the settlement have not been…
In December 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against several manufacturers of flushable wipes – specifically, Costco, CVS, Kimberly-Clark, Procter & Gamble, Target, Walgreens, and Walmart – for allegedly falsely…
March 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied An order the U.S. Supreme Court issues to review a lower court’s judgment.. January 2015: TINA.org filed an amicus brief supporting a December…
March 2014: The appeal was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. pursuant to a settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement have not been…
December 2016: An amended complaint was filed in the state court action against Procter & Gamble and Nehemiah Manufacturing Company. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the companies deceptively market Pampers…
May 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not…
October 2015: The named plaintiff dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have…
February 2016: The lawsuit was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have yet to be disclosed. November 2015: A…
March 2016: The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. November 2015:…
In March 2016, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed against Gillette and Procter & Gamble alleging that the marketing for Duracell AA and AAA Copper Top batteries with…
In October 2015, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the makers of Duracell batteries alleging, among other things, that the marketing (including TV and radio commercials, and product…
December 2014: The parties agreed to dismiss this lawsuit. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. September 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble…
What consumers should know about software tethering.
The bottom line? Toothpaste tubes aren’t generally getting recycled.
See how you stack up.
An FDA panel’s recent findings has led to a flood of lawsuits.
Why is Secret making a big deal out of something that is true of all deodorants?