Class Action

Speed Stick Stain Guard


Case Name (Date)

Muller et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
21-cv-36, E.D. Mo.
(Dec. 2020)


Product/Service

Speed Stick Stain Guard antiperspirants


Allegations

Falsely advertising that antiperspirants fight yellow stains and do not leave white marks when the primary active ingredient in them (aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY) causes both yellow stains and white marks


Status

Pending



Legal Action

Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

TINA.org found Colgate-Palmolive deceptively marketing its Colgate and Tom’s of Maine toothpaste tubes as “recyclable” despite not being recycled in reality.


Class-Action Tracker

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Class Action

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Allegations: Deceptively marketing candy- and fruit-flavored mouth rinses as safe for children when fluoride mouth rinses are not safe for children younger than 6 years old

Colgate Toothpastes

Class Action

Colgate Toothpastes

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain, or are at risk of containing, toxic heavy metals, including lead and mercury

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Class Action

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain a bacteria and may increase the risk of contracting invasive infections


The Latest

Filters


Show More