Class Action

Lady Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirant

Class Action

Lady Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirant


Case Name (Date)

Heidger et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
21-cv-35, E.D. Mo.
(Dec. 2020)


Product/Service

Lady Speed Stick Stain Guard antiperspirants


Allegations

Misleadingly marketing that the antiperspirants fight yellow stains and do not leave white marks when the primary active ingredient in the products actually causes both yellow stains and white marks


Status

Pending



Legal Action

Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

TINA.org found Colgate-Palmolive deceptively marketing its Colgate and Tom’s of Maine toothpaste tubes as “recyclable” despite not being recycled in reality.


Class-Action Tracker

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Class Action

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Allegations: Deceptively marketing candy- and fruit-flavored mouth rinses as safe for children when fluoride mouth rinses are not safe for children younger than 6 years old

Colgate Toothpastes

Class Action

Colgate Toothpastes

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain, or are at risk of containing, toxic heavy metals, including lead and mercury

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Class Action

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain a bacteria and may increase the risk of contracting invasive infections

Speed Stick Stain Guard

Class Action

Speed Stick Stain Guard

Allegations: Falsely advertising that antiperspirants fight yellow stains and white marks when the active ingredient causes both


The Latest

Filters


Show More