Class Action

Colgate’s Optic White

In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive Co. for allegedly falsely representing that Optic White toothpaste “Goes Beyond Surface Stain Removal to Deeply Whiten” teeth when, according to plaintiffs, the toothpaste does not work as advertised because it does not contain enough of the whitening ingredient and does not come in contact with teeth long enough to deeply whiten them. (Willis et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., Case No. 19-cv-8542, C. D. CA.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Colgate’s Optic White toothpastes, click here.


Legal Action

Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

TINA.org found Colgate-Palmolive deceptively marketing its Colgate and Tom’s of Maine toothpaste tubes as “recyclable” despite not being recycled in reality.


Class-Action Tracker

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Class Action

Hello Kids Fluoride Rinses

Allegations: Deceptively marketing candy- and fruit-flavored mouth rinses as safe for children when fluoride mouth rinses are not safe for children younger than 6 years old

Colgate Toothpastes

Class Action

Colgate Toothpastes

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain, or are at risk of containing, toxic heavy metals, including lead and mercury

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Class Action

Fabuloso Cleaning Products

Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain a bacteria and may increase the risk of contracting invasive infections

Speed Stick Stain Guard

Class Action

Speed Stick Stain Guard

Allegations: Falsely advertising that antiperspirants fight yellow stains and white marks when the active ingredient causes both


The Latest

Filters


Show More