Glad Recycling Bags
Allegations: Falsely advertising products as “Recycling” bags for municipal use
Charles et al. v. The Clorox Co.
22-cv-6855, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2022)
Kossel et al. v. The Clorox Co.
22-cv-10450, S.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2022)
Scandore et al. v. The Clorox Co.
22-cv-6545, E.D.N.Y.
(Oct. 2022)
Swetz et al. v. The Clorox Co.
22-cv-9374, S.D.N.Y.
(Nov. 2022)
Various Pine-Sol cleaning products
Failing to disclose that products contain a bacteria (pseudomonas aeruginosa) and may increase the risk of contracting invasive infections
Charles, Kossel, and Swetz cases: Settled
(Final approval granted)
Scandore case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Allegations: Falsely advertising products as “Recycling” bags for municipal use
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “recycling” bags
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “recycling” bags
Allegations: Falsely marketing bags using the word “recycling” when they are made of a material that is not recyclable
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing “ingredients from nature” that are obtained using “responsible sourcing” methods when the products contain harmful chemicals
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe and effective whitening toothpastes when scientific studies show that charcoal toothpastes do not whiten teeth, are “overly abrasive” and damage tooth enamel
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “99.7 % Natural”
Allegations: Products make fewer bottles of formula than advertised
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products “[k]ill[] 99.9% of bacteria on laundry”
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain harmful ingredients
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Deceiving consumers by making them think that Clorox Splash-Less Bleach is the same as regular Clorox Bleach when the Splash-Less Bleach does not sanitize or disinfect
July 2020: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. April 2020: A state court judge granted preliminary approval of a settlement agreement that would provide class…
May 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. January 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against The Clorox Company and The…
October 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been…
In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Clorox Company for allegedly falsely claiming that home cleaning products in its Green Works® line – including the Multi-Surface Cleaner,…
In February 2015, a federal judge dismissed a false advertising lawsuit against Clorox because the parties reached a settlement and agreed to dismiss the lawsuit. The complaint, which was originally…
See how you stack up.
A master list of known and alleged scams.
Less splash, more confusing marketing.
The largest retailer in the world isn’t just turning a blind eye to the deceptive marketing of these products.
Be wary of the advertised shelf life of these “reusable cloths.”