Burt’s Bees Cosmetics
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
Burt’s Bees Infant Formulas
Case Name (Date)
Frederick et al. v. Perrigo Co.
22-cv-1333, S.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2022)
Product/Service
Burt’s Bees Infant Formulas
Allegations
Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Burt’s Bees Products
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing “ingredients from nature” that are obtained using “responsible sourcing” methods when the products contain harmful chemicals
Burt’s Bees Charcoal Toothpastes
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe and effective whitening toothpastes when scientific studies show that charcoal toothpastes do not whiten teeth, are “overly abrasive” and damage tooth enamel
Burt’s Bees Dog Shampoos and Conditioners
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “99.7 % Natural”
Several Brands of Baby and Infant Formula Powders
Allegations: Products make fewer bottles of formula than advertised
Burt’s Bees Mascaras and Lip Shimmers
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain harmful ingredients
Burt’s Bees Lipsticks, Lip Butter, and Other Products
Allegations: False natural claims
Burt’s Bees Güd Products
May 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. January 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against The Clorox Company and The…
The Latest
We Play Different | The North Face
Mother Nature doesn’t play games, and neither does The North Face
NA-KD Fashion
Not all free shipping claims are cut from the same cloth.
BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.