Burt’s Bees Cosmetics
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
Barrett et al. v. The Clorox Co., Burt’s Bees, Inc., and The Burt’s Bees Product Co.
22-cv-2193, N.D. Cal.
(April 2022)
Burt’s Bees cosmetics, including Lip Shimmer, Lip Shine, Nourishing Mascara, Satin Lipstick, and Matte Stick
Falsely marketing products as containing “ingredients from nature” that are obtained using “responsible sourcing” methods that “help[] to safeguard access to clean water … and promote health, safety and biodiversity” when the products contain harmful chemicals (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances)
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe and effective whitening toothpastes when scientific studies show that charcoal toothpastes do not whiten teeth, are “overly abrasive” and damage tooth enamel
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “99.7 % Natural”
Allegations: Products make fewer bottles of formula than advertised
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain harmful ingredients
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Allegations: False natural claims
May 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. January 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against The Clorox Company and The…
See how you stack up.
A master list of known and alleged scams.
Less splash, more confusing marketing.
The largest retailer in the world isn’t just turning a blind eye to the deceptive marketing of these products.
Be wary of the advertised shelf life of these “reusable cloths.”