Verizon Monthly Rates
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Verizon Wireless alleging that its May 2019 Mother’s Day promotion was a bait-and-switch scheme. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company falsely promised that consumers who bought an iPhone XR, iPhone XS MAX, iPhone XS, or iPhone X as part of the promotion would get a free iPhone XR when, according to plaintiffs, consumers received a charge for the “free” iPhone on their next bill. (Wise et al v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Cellco Partnership, both d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al, Case No. 60CV-20-1970, Arkansas State Court, Pulaski County)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Verizon, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates of wireless service plans
Allegations: Charging subscribers more than the advertised rate by adding an undisclosed fictitious fee to their monthly bills
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that Verizon is committed to protecting the environment and people when its cables are covered in toxic lead
November 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been…
December 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties settled the matter. The terms of the settlement agreement have…
February 2016: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Hansell et al v. TracFone Wireless, Inc. dba Straight Talk Wireless et al, Case No.…
February 2016: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Hansell et al v. TracFone Wireless, Inc. dba Straight Talk Wireless et al, Case No.…
An “unlimited” plan undone by its own terms and conditions.
Instant replay shows six instances in which Super Bowl 52 advertisers have fumbled ad claims.
Verizon calls foul on NAD inquiry that results in referral to federal regulators after Comcast challenges its internet speed and reliability claims.
Corporate doublespeak is as hard to decipher as the questionable claims in the ads themselves.