
OnStar Smart Driver and Smart Driver+
Allegations: Failing to disclose that data regarding consumers’ driving behavior collected by OnStar is shared with third parties
July 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of the Ellis case. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive either a cash award in the amount of $750 or $1,500 (the amount depends on the difference between the correct and incorrect estimates of the cost of fuel on the window stickers), or a $2,000 voucher for class members or someone in their immediate family to use toward the purchase of a new GM vehicle within three years. In addition, the company represents that it began a voluntary correction program in May 2017. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for November 6, 2017.
June 2016: Two more class-action lawsuits were filed against General Motors making the same false advertising allegations. To read the complaints, click on the case information below.
April 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against General Motors for allegedly falsely advertising the fuel-economy ratings of 2016 Chevrolet Traverses, Buick Enclaves, and GMC Acadias by overstating the expected gas mileage of the vehicles. According to the complaint, the company advertised that vehicles travel 17 miles per gallon (mpg) during city driving, 24 mpg on the highway, and 19 mpg of combined driving when, according to plaintiffs, the vehicles travel 15 mpg during city driving, 22 mpg on the highway, and 17 mpg of combined driving. (An amended complaint was filed in August 2016.) (Ellis et al v. General Motors, LLC, Case No. 16-cv-11747, E. D. MI.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding fuel economy claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.
Allegations: Failing to disclose that data regarding consumers’ driving behavior collected by OnStar is shared with third parties
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles
Allegations: Falsely marketing vehicles as safe, durable, and reliable
Allegations: Deceptively marketing vehicles as “Clean Diesel”
Allegations: Falsely marketing filters as Made in USA
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing vehicles as safe and functional when there is a risk the batteries will catch on fire
Allegations: Overstating the weight that vehicles can safely pull
TINA.org reader flags “ultimate apples to oranges” comparison.
When companies green it, they better mean it.
The oil isn’t the only thing that needs changing at this Chevrolet dealership.
Not all of the puffed-up claims in this TV ad can be defended as puffery.
A closer look at the who, what, where, when, and why.