
OnStar Smart Driver and Smart Driver+
Allegations: Failing to disclose that data regarding consumers’ driving behavior collected by OnStar is shared with third parties
May 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of a settlement agreement resolving this case. According to the settlement terms, each class member will receive a $1,000 cash award and a $1,000 voucher to use toward the lease or purchase of a new GM vehicle at any authorized GM Dealership in the United States.
2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against General Motors alleging that GM represented that Cadillac CTS Sedans had received the highest safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in certain categories (e.g., Frontal Crash Driver, Frontal Crash Passenger, and Rollover) when, according to the complaint, the vehicle had not received such ratings. (Carriuolo et al v. General Motors LLC, Case No. 14-cv-61429, S.D. Fla.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding automobiles and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Allegations: Failing to disclose that data regarding consumers’ driving behavior collected by OnStar is shared with third parties
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicles
Allegations: Falsely marketing vehicles as safe, durable, and reliable
Allegations: Deceptively marketing vehicles as “Clean Diesel”
Allegations: Falsely marketing filters as Made in USA
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing vehicles as safe and functional when there is a risk the batteries will catch on fire
Allegations: Overstating the weight that vehicles can safely pull
TINA.org reader flags “ultimate apples to oranges” comparison.
When companies green it, they better mean it.
The oil isn’t the only thing that needs changing at this Chevrolet dealership.
Not all of the puffed-up claims in this TV ad can be defended as puffery.
A closer look at the who, what, where, when, and why.