Class Action

Uber’s “Safe Rides Fee”

Class Action

Uber’s “Safe Rides Fee”

August 2019: The Court granted final approval.

August 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved the amended settlement agreement.

June 2017: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of an amended settlement agreement, which provides class members with $0.25 for their first Safe Rides Fee Service and $0.05 for each subsequent Safe Rides Fee Service. In addition, the company agreed to be bound by the injunctive relief terms proposed in the 2016 settlement agreement. Specifically, the company agreed:

  • to change how it describes its background check process;
  • to stop using certain statements, such as “safest ride on the road” and “industry-leading;” and
  • not to charge any fee entitled “Safe Rides Fee.”

May 2017: The claims of one of the named plaintiffs (Philliben) were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

August 2016: A federal judge denied preliminary approval of the settlement concluding that the settlement’s terms did not base each class member’s compensation on the type and number of Uber services purchased and, as a result, “unfairly provide[d] preferential treatment to certain [] class members.”

February 2016: The parties agreed to settle this lawsuit. The proposed settlement provides both monetary and injunctive relief. According to its terms, the company will make various changes to its marketing, including:

  • Not using certain phrases – including “best available” and “industry leading” – to describe its background checks;
  • Not representing Uber’s Rideshare Service as, among other things, the “safest ride on the road” and the “safest transportation option;” and
  • Not calling any fee the “Safe Rides Fee.”

In addition, class members may receive equal shares of the $28.5 million settlement fund after other costs and expenses (including administrative costs, service awards, and attorneys’ fees) are paid. If any money remains in the settlement fund, the remainder will be given to the National Consumer Law Center in the form of a (French for “as near as possible”): a legal doctrine that requires a judge to consider the manner in which unclaimed settlement funds in class action lawsuits are distributed. Under this doctrine, the remaining funds must be distributed for the indirect benefit of the class instead of benefiting the defendant. award.

January 2016: After several false advertising class-action lawsuits were filed against Uber, a consolidated complaint was filed alleging that the company’s advertising misrepresents its “Safe Rides Fee,” as well as the nature and character of background checks of drivers and other safety measures. Specifically, according to the complaint, Uber represents that the fee is used to support “industry-leading” background checks and other safety measures when, in reality, the company’s background checks and safety measures are “woefully inadequate.” (Philliben et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-5615, N. D. CA.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Uber and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.


Class-Action Tracker

Uber’s Upfront Pricing

Class Action

Uber’s Upfront Pricing

Allegations: Routinely charging riders more than the cost quoted to them before purchase in the app’s Upfront Pricing feature

Uber Gratuities

Class Action

Uber Gratuities

February 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of a settlement agreement that resolves this lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class members will be refunded the amount of the…

Uber’s “Safe Ride” Message to Women

Class Action

Uber’s “Safe Ride” Message to Women

In November 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Uber for, among other things, allegedly targeting women in its ads and promising a “safe ride” when the number of reported…

The Cost of Uber Rides

Class Action

The Cost of Uber Rides

In May 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Uber for allegedly misleading consumers by showing consumers the “actual fare” of a ride before they book the ride and then…

Uber’s Safe Rides Representations

Class Action

Uber’s Safe Rides Representations

In January 2016, the parties to a false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Uber agreed to dismiss the case after reaching a settlement agreement, the terms of which are confidential.…

Uber’s Rates and Credits

Class Action

Uber’s Rates and Credits

In July 2015, a false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Uber. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Uber advertises its prices are 30% cheaper than cabs for specific routes when…


The Latest

Filters

Uber

Ad Alert

Uber

Cab companies sue Uber over claims that the ride-sharing service is “the safest ride on the road.”