
Signature Select Cans of Sliced Peaches and Mandarin Orange Fruit Cups
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain 100% fruit juice
February 2024: The case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled..
October 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-1040, D.N.M.)
September 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Kroger Company and Albertsons for allegedly falsely advertising beef products from imported cattle as “Product of the U.S.” (Thornton et al v. The Kroger Company and Albertsons, Case No. D-202-CV-2020-05018, New Mexico State Court – Bernalillo)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of made in USA marketing claims, click here.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain 100% fruit juice
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “smoked”
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices and as available for a limited time
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing parmesan cheese products as “100%” grated parmesan cheese
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “Naturally Flavored”
Allegations: Falsely marketing that phenylephrine products treat congestion and other cold and flu symptoms
Allegations: Misleading promotions for “free” products
Allegations: Falsely marketing that medicines treat nasal congestion
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing lidocaine patches
Allegations: Marketing that consumers who purchase items during promotions get “free” products when the store increases the price of the first product during promotions
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as compostable
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled boxes
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Rapid Release”
Allegations: Charging customers higher prices than those represented at the time of checkout
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing medicines as “non-drowsy” when an ingredient in them causes drowsiness
Allegations: Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
Lawsuits allege products contain ingredients harmful to coral reefs and marine life.
Plaintiffs allege packaging misrepresents lidocaine dosages as ‘maximum strength,’ among other things.
A TINA.org scoop in 2019 sparks a class-action trend in 2020.
Lawsuits claim infant-specific products aren’t any different than acetaminophen medications for older children.