
L’Oréal
TINA.org objected to a settlement that sought to resolve claims filed by the FTC against L’Oréal for deceptively advertising its Lancôme Génifique and L’Oréal Paris Youth Code skincare products by…
August 2019: Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal order.
July 2019: A federal judge dismissed this case concluding that the claims were preempted by federal law and the plaintiffs did not adequately allege that reasonable consumers would be deceived by the product packaging.
2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against L’Oréal USA for allegedly misleadingly packaging L’Oréal and Maybelline liquid cosmetics – including L’Oréal Age Perfect Eye Renewal Eye Cream and Revitalift Bright Reveal Brightening Day Moisturizer and Maybelline Superstay Better Skin Skin-Transforming Foundation – by stating the amount of liquid cosmetic in the container without disclosing that consumers will not be able to access a large portion (sometimes more than half) of the product in the container because the pumps are defective. Plaintiffs originally filed their complaint in June and amended their complaint in November. (Critcher et al v. L’Oréal USA, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-5639, S. D. N. Y.)
TINA.org objected to a settlement that sought to resolve claims filed by the FTC against L’Oréal for deceptively advertising its Lancôme Génifique and L’Oréal Paris Youth Code skincare products by…
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that products were safe
Allegations: Misrepresenting that products were safe when they contained, or were at risk of containing, the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Falsely advertising sunscreens as waterproof
Allegations: Falsely marketing the mascara as safe when it contains substances that can be harmful to humans
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing cosmetics as made in France when they are actually manufactured in the United States and Canada
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain ingredients that increase the risk of adverse health effects, including endometriosis, abnormalities in reproductive organs, and various cancers
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain ingredients that increase the risk of adverse health effects, including cancer
Allegations: Misrepresenting products as safe when they contain chemicals that increase the risk of cancer
Allegations: Falsely advertising that products provide protection from the sun for 24 hours
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Falsely advertising face brushes as waterproof
Allegations: Falsely advertising that products “restore [the] skin’s cushion” and “smooth wrinkles” when collagen applied topically does not penetrate skin to provide such benefits
Allegations: Misleadingly stating the amount of product in bottles without disclosing that bottles have defective pumps that fail to dispense significant amounts
See how you stack up.
Do dermatologists really recommend CeraVe more than any other skincare brand?
See how you stack up.
TINA.org investigates what’s behind the cruelty-free logos on the labels of cosmetic products.
Finding evidence of a material relationship on this sponsored post requires some real sleuthing.