Keurig Dr Pepper
TINA.org found Keurig engaged in deceptive recyclability campaign for its K-Cup pods.
Multiple class-action lawsuits have been filed against Keurig alleging that it falsely markets its single-serve coffee pods as recyclable when the pods are not recycled in reality. More information about each lawsuit is below.
| Case Name (Date) |
Status |
|---|---|
| Sulli et al. v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. 26-cv-6420, W.D.N.Y. (April 2026) |
Pending |
| Dixon et al. v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. 26-cv-2172, S.D. Cal. (April 2026) |
Pending |
| Downing et al. v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. 20-cv-11673, D. Mass. (Sept. 2020) |
Voluntarily dismissed because the claims were resolved by the settlement in Smith v. Keurig |
| Smith et al. v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. RG18922722, California State Court – Alameda County (Nov. 2018) |
Settled (Final approval granted) |
TINA.org found Keurig engaged in deceptive recyclability campaign for its K-Cup pods.
Allegations: Falsely marketing when discounts end
Allegations: Marketing products as containing “100%” fruit juices when they contain the synthetic ingredient ascorbic acid
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “All Natural”
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are produced in Canada when they are produced in the United States
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as natural
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that descaling coffee makers would “extend” their life without disclosing that following the company’s descaling instructions would make them unusable
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products contain “All-Natural Flavors” and “100% Natural Flavors”
Allegations: Representing that one-year warranties start running on the date of purchase when California state law prohibits warranties from beginning before a product is delivered
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as natural and 100% juice
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain natural flavors without disclosing that they also contain artificial flavors
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as natural
Allegations: Marketing drinks as “safe” and containing “all natural ingredients” when their packaging contains synthetic chemicals called per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAs) that harm people and the environment
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing “No Added Preservatives”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that sodas are “made with aged vanilla”
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Falsely advertising products as containing no artificial flavors when they contain a synthetic ingredient
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Falsely marketing Mott’s products as natural
Is this iced tea indeed natural?
Tallying up added sugars wasn’t easy.
Company agrees to stop adding vitamins to drinks.