Class Action

Keurig’s Recyclability Claims

Class Action

Keurig’s Recyclability Claims

Multiple class-action lawsuits have been filed against Keurig alleging that it falsely markets its single-serve coffee pods as recyclable when the pods are not recycled in reality. More information about each lawsuit is below.

Case Name
(Date)
Status
Sulli et al. v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
26-cv-6420, W.D.N.Y.
(April 2026)
Pending
Dixon et al. v. Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
26-cv-2172, S.D. Cal.
(April 2026)
Pending
Downing et al. v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
20-cv-11673, D. Mass.
(Sept. 2020)
Voluntarily dismissed because the claims were resolved by the settlement in Smith v. Keurig
Smith et al. v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
RG18922722, California State Court – Alameda County
(Nov. 2018)
Settled
(Final approval granted)

Legal Action

Keurig Dr Pepper

Keurig Dr Pepper

TINA.org found Keurig engaged in deceptive recyclability campaign for its K-Cup pods.


Class-Action Tracker

Mott’s Juices

Class Action

Mott’s Juices

Allegations: Marketing products as containing “100%” fruit juices when they contain the synthetic ingredient ascorbic acid

Canada Dry Beverages

Class Action

Canada Dry Beverages

Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are produced in Canada when they are produced in the United States

7-Up Beverages

Class Action

7-Up Beverages

Allegations: Falsely marketing that products contain “All-Natural Flavors” and “100% Natural Flavors”

Keurig Product Warranties

Class Action

Keurig Product Warranties

Allegations: Representing that one-year warranties start running on the date of purchase when California state law prohibits warranties from beginning before a product is delivered

Orchard Apple Nantucket Nectar

Class Action

Orchard Apple Nantucket Nectar

Allegations: Marketing drinks as “safe” and containing “all natural ingredients” when their packaging contains synthetic chemicals called per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAs) that harm people and the environment


The Latest

Filters


Show More