Burt’s Bees Cosmetics
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
May 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
January 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against The Clorox Company and The Burt’s Bees Products Company for allegedly labeling Güd brand products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain unnatural and synthetic ingredients. (Cesarini et al v. The Clorox Company and The Burt’s Bees Products Company, Case No. 18-cv-208, N. D. CA.)
For more information about natural claims, click here.
Allegations: Falsely representing cosmetics as natural when they contain substances that are harmful to human health
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing “ingredients from nature” that are obtained using “responsible sourcing” methods when the products contain harmful chemicals
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe and effective whitening toothpastes when scientific studies show that charcoal toothpastes do not whiten teeth, are “overly abrasive” and damage tooth enamel
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “99.7 % Natural”
Allegations: Products make fewer bottles of formula than advertised
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain harmful ingredients
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Allegations: False natural claims
See how you stack up.
A master list of known and alleged scams.
Less splash, more confusing marketing.
Be wary of the advertised shelf life of these “reusable cloths.”