Burger King’s Whopper
Allegations: Falsely advertising Whoppers as containing larger burger patties and toppings than they actually do
Whopper
Case Name (Date)
Hussain et al. v. Burger King Corp.
22-cv-2258, N.D. Cal.
(April 2022)
Product/Service
Whopper and French Fries
Allegations
Falsely marketing products as “safe” and “sustainable” when the packaging contains per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS), which are harmful to people and the environment, as well as organic fluorine, which indicates they contain PFAS
Status
Class-Action Tracker
Burger King’s Impossible Burger
September 2020: The appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Case No. 20-13128, 11th Cir.) August 2020: The named plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal order. July…
Burger King’s BOGO Coupon Promotion
April 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. December 2017: A federal judge preliminary approved the settlement agreement. The final fairness hearing is scheduled for April…
The Latest
These Super Bowl LVIII Advertisers Have Been Taken to Court for Deceptive Marketing
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
By the Numbers: Greenwashing Class-Action Lawsuits
TINA.org has tracked more than 100 lawsuits alleging greenwashing.
CATrends: Where’s the Beef?
Lawsuits challenge the amount of meat and toppings depicted in fast-food marketing images.
Burger King Spicy Chicken Fries
The latest chapter in our Fast-Food Chicken Diaries.
CATrends: Marketing Claims for Products Containing PFAS
Class-action lawsuits target human and environmentally-friendly claims.