Burger King’s Whopper
Allegations: Falsely advertising Whoppers as containing larger burger patties and toppings than they actually do
Whopper
Case Name (Date)
Hussain et al. v. Burger King Corp.
22-cv-2258, N.D. Cal.
(April 2022)
Product/Service
Whopper and French Fries
Allegations
Falsely marketing products as “safe” and “sustainable” when the packaging contains per- and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS), which are harmful to people and the environment, as well as organic fluorine, which indicates they contain PFAS
Status
Class-Action Tracker
Burger King’s Impossible Burger
September 2020: The appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Case No. 20-13128, 11th Cir.) August 2020: The named plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal order. July…
Burger King’s BOGO Coupon Promotion
April 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. December 2017: A federal judge preliminary approved the settlement agreement. The final fairness hearing is scheduled for April…
The Latest
Popeyes’ Chicken Tenders: Are They Really Tenders?
TINA.org reader takes issue with Popeyes calling its breast strips “tenders.”
Burger King Rebel Whopper
U.K. regulator bans ads it said misleadingly implied that burger was suitable for vegans and vegetarians.
Impossible Whopper
The blurred lines of Burger King’s grill lines.
Walking Halloween Ads
Characters from commercials turn into costumes for trick or treating.