
Tom’s of Maine Kid’s Natural Fluoride-Free Silly Strawberry Toothpastes
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain, or are at risk of containing, lead and arsenic
In June 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Tom’s of Maine for allegedly falsely marketing Tom’s Toothpaste as natural when, according to plaintiffs, the toothpaste contains chemically processed ingredients. (Coburn et al v. Tom’s of Maine, Inc., Case No. 20-cv-1036, C.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of toothpastes, click here.
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain, or are at risk of containing, lead and arsenic
Allegations: Marketing products as safe, healthy, natural, and effective
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as safe and gentle whitening toothpastes when charcoal is abrasive to enamel and gums
Allegations: Falsely advertising toothpaste tubes as recyclable
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Falsely marketing toothpaste as “antiplaque” when none of the ingredients reduce, prevent or remove plaque
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled containers
TINA.org files greenwashing complaints against eco-friendly toothpaste brand.
With Earth Day right around the corner, here’s a handful of items whose earthy claims have been challenged.
It’s the “natural” deodorant whose sole active ingredient is not natural.