
Rubbermaid TakeAlongs Food Storage Containers
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “Microwave Safe,” “Microwave Reheatable,” and “Freezer Safe”
Barrales et al. v. Newell Brands Inc.
24-cv-3025, N.D. Ga.
(July 2024)
Barrales et al. v. Newell Brands Inc.
25-cv-1882, C.D. Cal.
(Dec. 2024)
Nuk baby bottles
Falsely marketing products as safe and “BPA Free” when they contain harmful microplastics that are released when products are heated
Barrales case (No. 24-cv-3025): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Barrales case (No. 25-cv-1882): Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “Microwave Safe,” “Microwave Reheatable,” and “Freezer Safe”
Allegations: Falsely marketing pacifiers as “orthodontic”
Allegations: Falsely marketing that ice stays frozen in its ice coolers for five days
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Graco booster seats
Allegations: Failing to timely disclose that warranties are conditioned upon using an authorized repair service
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose that warranties are contingent on consumers registering their personal information
Perdue plays chicken with NAD over organic claims.
Keeping produce “nearly as fresh as the day it was picked.” Well, one type of produce anyway.
U.S.-made misrepresentations continue one year after TINA.org alerted company to false and deceptive claims.
False and deceptive made in USA representations prompts action.
This made in the USA claim might not be dishwasher-safe.