Fanta Piña Colada
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing drinks as containing “100% Natural Flavors”
Fanta Piña Colada Soda
Case Name (Date)
Hawkins et al v. The Coca-Cola Co.
21-cv-8788, S.D.N.Y.
(Oct. 2021)
Product/Service
Fanta piña colada soda
Allegations
Falsely marketing products as having “100% natural flavors” when they contain artificial flavors
Misleadingly representing that products contain pineapples and coconuts when the beverages contain very little, if any, of these ingredients
Status
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Class-Action Tracker
Fanta Dragon Fruit Soda
Allegations: False natural claims
Fanta Berry-Flavored Drinks
Allegations: False natural claims
The Latest
TINA.org’s Social Media Influencers Actions
A review of TINA.org’s work exposing deceptive marketing tactics by social media influencers.
Winter Olympics Stumble Out the Gate Re #Ad Disclosure
These brand-relationship disclosures are far from world-class.
BodyArmor
Sports drink company’s Haterade-fueled ad claims head to FTC for further review.
A Deluge of Doublespeak
Corporate doublespeak is as hard to decipher as the questionable claims in the ads themselves.
Ad or Not? Big Papi’s Final Walk-Off
Sweet family moment or promotion for Coke?