Fanta Piña Colada
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing drinks as containing “100% Natural Flavors”
Hawkins et al v. The Coca-Cola Co.
21-cv-8788, S.D.N.Y.
(Oct. 2021)
Fanta piña colada soda
Falsely marketing products as having “100% natural flavors” when they contain artificial flavors
Misleadingly representing that products contain pineapples and coconuts when the beverages contain very little, if any, of these ingredients
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing drinks as containing “100% Natural Flavors”
Allegations: False natural claims
Allegations: False natural claims
Lots of James Corden’s Late Late Show segments go viral but which are ads?
This most-liked Instagram post of all time finally fesses up to what it really is.
Oh, the irony behind these five brand names.
TINA.org is throwing the flag on several Big Game advertisers this year.
TINA.org files a friend of the court brief opposing proposed settlement.