
Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months
Wacker et al. v. Mead Johnson & Co., LLC
22PH-CV-00808, Missouri state court – Phelps County
(June 2022)
Enfamil baby formula powders
Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Settled
(Final approval granted)
http://www.mjcservingsettlement.com/
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
Memory supplement’s “clinically proven” ingredients claims fall apart upon closer inspection of supporting ingredient studies.
What goes into these fragrances? We may never know.
With spring in the air, keep your expectations surrounding these claims grounded.
New report finds issues with nutrition-related messaging.
An industry self-regulatory board looks to clean up Lysol’s claims.