Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months
Enfamil Baby Formula Powders
Case Name (Date)
Wacker et al. v. Mead Johnson & Co., LLC
22PH-CV-00808, Missouri state court – Phelps County
(June 2022)
Product/Service
Enfamil baby formula powders
Allegations
Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Status
Settled
(Final approval granted)
http://www.mjcservingsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Enfamil and Enfamil Premature
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Enfamil Infant Formula
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Enfamil Infant Formulas
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
The Latest
TINA’s List
Readers have told us to look into these MLMs.
Advertising of Supplement Targeting Seniors Questioned
TINA.org Joins with AARP in Objecting to Move Free Class-Action Settlement MADISON, Conn., March 12, 2015 — More than 46 million people suffer from arthritis, many of them elderly, and…
Lawsuits: Glucosamine’s Promised Relief Mostly Marketing Hype
Consumers report adverse reactions.
Proposed Glucosamine Settlement Stiffs Consumers
Class-action settlement over supplement sold by Walmart, Walgreens and Supervalu provides little relief to consumers.
