Enfamil Infant Formula
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
In November 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Mead Johnson & Company for, among other things, allegedly deceptively marketing Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions formula as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months when, according to plaintiffs, the product contains less protein and more added sugar, calories, carbohydrates, and fat than is recommended for toddlers. (Palmieri et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-9591, S.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of toddler formulas, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Enfamil Infant Formulas
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
Enfamil Baby Formula Powders
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
The Latest
CATrends: Toddler Formula
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.
Report: Most Advertised Baby Food Not Nutritious
New report finds issues with nutrition-related messaging.
Baby Products Under Fire for Ad Claims
Better Sleep? Natural? Baby products are facing suits for false marketing.