
Enfamil and Enfamil Premature
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Lopez et al. v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. et al.
24-cv-691, N.D. Ill.
(Jan. 2024)
Raya et al. v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. et al.
24-cv-4696, N.D. Ill.
(May 2024)
Enfamil infant formulas
Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
In November 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Mead Johnson & Company for, among other things, allegedly deceptively marketing Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions formula as “nutritionally appropriate” for children…
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.
New report finds issues with nutrition-related messaging.
Better Sleep? Natural? Baby products are facing suits for false marketing.