Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
Allegations: Deceptively marketing products as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months
Enfamil Infant Formula
Case Name (Date)
Lopez et al. v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. et al.
24-cv-691, N.D. Ill.
(Jan. 2024)
Raya et al. v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. et al.
24-cv-4696, N.D. Ill.
(May 2024)
Product/Service
Enfamil infant formulas
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Enfamil and Enfamil Premature
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Enfamil Infant Formulas
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
Enfamil Baby Formula Powders
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
The Latest
CATrends: Toddler Formula
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.
Report: Most Advertised Baby Food Not Nutritious
New report finds issues with nutrition-related messaging.
Baby Products Under Fire for Ad Claims
Better Sleep? Natural? Baby products are facing suits for false marketing.