![](https://truthinadvertising.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Enfamil.jpg)
Enfamil and Enfamil Premature
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Wacker et al. v. Mead Johnson & Co., LLC
22PH-CV-00808, Missouri state court – Phelps County
(June 2022)
Enfamil baby formula powders
Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
Settled
(Final approval granted)
http://www.mjcservingsettlement.com/
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
In November 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Mead Johnson & Company for, among other things, allegedly deceptively marketing Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions formula as “nutritionally appropriate” for children…
An FDA panel’s recent findings has led to a flood of lawsuits.
Products marketed to clear up stuffy noses and relieve sinus congestion don’t work, researchers say.
TINA.org files brief urging court to deny final approval of settlement that is unfair to consumers.
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.