Class Action

Crest Sensitivity Toothpaste

Class Action

Crest Sensitivity Toothpaste

March 2014: The appeal was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. pursuant to a settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.

October 2013: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. Later in October, an objector filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the decision to approve the settlement.

February 2013: A federal judge preliminarily approved a class-action lawsuit settlement between Proctor & Gamble Co. and consumers who claimed the company falsely advertised its Crest Sensitivity Treatment & Protection toothpaste as providing relief from tooth sensitivity “within minutes.”  P&G has agreed to refund the actual purchase price to Class Members who submit a valid Claim Form and documentation showing the actual price paid.  For those Class Members who don’t have the proper documentation, P&G has agreed to refund them $4.  (Edward Rossi v. The Proctor & Gamble Co., Case No. 11-cv-07238, D. N.J.)

 


Class-Action Tracker

Crest Charcoal Toothpastes

Class Action

Crest Charcoal Toothpastes

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing charcoal toothpastes as safe, gentle, whitening, and healthy when they pose safety risks and are abrasive


The Latest

Filters

Ad Watchdog TINA.org Petitions FTC for Made in USA Rule

Press Release

Ad Watchdog TINA.org Petitions FTC for Made in USA Rule

MADISON, CONN. August 22, 2019– Consumer advocacy organization, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), filed a formal petition today requesting that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) use its rulemaking authority to expand its enforcement…


Show More