Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Air New Zealand presents “The Great Christmas Chase”
The magic of Christmas makes the impossible, possible šš #AirNZXmas
Cariuma
Sneaker company modifies sponsored social media post following TINA.org inquiry.
Worst False Ad Settlements of 2023
Class-action settlements that left consumers behind this year.
Todd Snyder
“Sitewide” sale didn’t include all items for sale on the site.
Roblox Marketers Feel The TensionāInside Brandsā Next Challenge On The Platform
Asa Hiken, Adage