Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
The Latest
Regulators Act on TINA.org’s Complaint Against Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
The Beginner | John Lewis & Partners
This annual heartstring-tugging tradition skates into another year.
Tom Brady and Other Celebrities Face Lawsuits over FTX Ads
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Deceptive Marketing by Rihanna’s Savage X Fenty Put to Bed in California
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit
Fisher Investments
Unearthing the fees that Fisher charges but doesn’t disclose in some of its TV ads.