Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
FDA Sends Amazon a Warning Letter
At issue is company’s distribution of products illegally marketed as drugs.
Michael Jackson Album Lawsuit Comes to An End
The case may be resolved but what will deceived consumers get out of the deal?
Liquid Death | Not A Waterboy
Canned water company signs a landmark endorsement deal with a “hydration assistant.”
Is Anthony Anderson’s Candyverse NFT Project a Scam?
The impact of a celebrity endorsement.
The Goop-ification of wellness is on the way out (you can thank Gen Z)
Rina Raphael, Los Angeles Times