Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
CATrends: Unscented Deodorants and Antiperspirants
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.
HydroJug’s Heat-Retention Claims
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?
With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.
MLMs Are Consistently Leaving Participants Behind
New book explores why MLMs are often associated with harmful outcomes – and what can be done about it.
Bytech America’s Made in USA Claims
Marketing and reality are not in sync.