Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
TINA.org Tells DOT: Don’t Muddy Airline Pricing
A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.
Carhartt: Making Football Possible
Carhartt honors the dedicated individuals who make football possible.
Tinggly
TINA.org unwraps the hidden cost of these gift boxes.
Alani Nu Facing Increased Scrutiny over Marketing to Kids
Following lawsuit, Texas AG launches probe into energy drink’s “youth-oriented branding strategies.”
Harper & Wells Boston
What you need to know about this shady e-commerce site.