Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
The FTC Needs to Update Its Endorsement Guides
TINA.org submits comment to FTC urging further revisions to stay relevant and effective
Warby Parker Has Exclamation Points!
As seen this past week in Connecticut…!!!
Period Tracker Capitalizes on Post-Roe Fears
Stardust marketing claims out of this world
The Princeton Review’s ‘SAT 1400+ Guaranteed*’ Test Prep Program
Note the asterisk.
CATrends: False and Misleading Protein Claims
Brands named in litigation include SlimFast, Silk and Beyond Meat, among others.