Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Monetizing Minors
How brands exploit kid influencers and their followers.
Keppal’s Made in USA Claims
TINA.org digs into online retailer’s U.S.-origin claims following consumer tip.
Carvana’s ‘7-Day Money-Back Guarantee’
Is it still a money-back guarantee if you end up paying hundreds of dollars?
CATrends: Nutriwashing
Lawsuits allege foods and beverages aren’t as healthy as you might think.
U-Haul Uses ‘Bait-and-Switch’ Advertising, According to Investigation by Watchdog Group
Herb Weisbaum, The ConsumerMan, Consumers’ Checkbook