Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
TINA.org Files FTC Complaint against Homeaglow
MADISON, CONN. Sept. 9, 2025 – An investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has found that Homeaglow is deceptively advertising $19 home cleanings in order to lure consumers into…
The Dirt on Homeaglow’s $19 Cleanings
TINA.org files complaint against home cleaning platform with FTC, states.
CATrends: Empty Space in Consumer Goods
Lawsuits aren’t giving any slack when it comes to underfilled packages.
Domino’s $6.99 Pizzas
Why advertise a price that no consumer will pay?
Military Glasses & Libiyi
Watch out for online retailers’ bait-and-switch tactics.