Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
CATrends: Deceptive Influencer Marketing
It’s a hot sponcon summer.
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
What’s this reservation good for?
Prevagen May Have Memory Problems
TINA.org continues to support FTC, New York in federal court.
EasyPack
A bogus connection to major retailers is just the beginning.
My Passport Hub
Don’t pay for free online government forms.