Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Breaking Down the Relationship between Brands and Teens
Today’s teenagers are uniquely positioned in the marketing world.
FTC Bans Fake Reviews
New rule also targets paid reviews.
Virgin Atlantic: ‘100% Sustainable Aviation Fuel’
Ad regulator finds term potentially misleading in context of radio ad.
College HUNKS’ Unattractive Side
TINA.org reader says moving company failed to live up to its ads. She’s not the only one.
Water-Resistant Claims for TicWatch Pro 5
Why you can’t take this smartwatch “anywhere.”