
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Certain Chicco car seats
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Pending
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
What you should know about this telehealth company’s compounded medication.
Why you should read all the terms before taking the bait on this offer.
Cautionary stories like Belle Gibson’s are not unique.
Got a text about unpaid tolls? Here’s what you need to know.
If you’ve been misled by an ad, regulators want to hear from you. We do too.