Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Airport Retailers Can Now Charge an Employee Benefits Fee—but It May Not Go to Workers
Georgia Fearn, Inc.com
CATrends: False HEPA Claims
Lawsuits attempt to clear the air.
Olive Tree People
These “waterless” beauty products contain some surprising ingredients.
The Struggle is (Not) Real
Rags-to-riches stories on repeat.
Giant Bicycles’ ‘Shipping Fee’
TINA.org finds bike maker peddling misleading online prices.