Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Xfinity Home Internet and Mobile Promotion
It’s easier to rack up hidden fees than it is to cancel.
AARP Membership
The only thing more “ridiculous” than the touted benefits is the cancellation process.
Should Movie Theaters Be Required to Advertise Actual Start Times?
Under a proposed bill, theaters could be fined for making moviegoers guess.
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
AT&T’s Connectivity Guarantee
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?