Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
AriZona Blueberry White Tea: ‘100% Natural White Tea’
Be wary of “natural” claims.
CATrends: ‘Daily Fantasy Sports’
Lawsuits throw the red flag on a number of DFS platforms.
Viator’s Free Cancellation Claims
This is not a sitewide perk.
NBA Stars’ Sneaky Alcohol Ads
These players dropped the ball in their recent offseason announcements.
Owner of FabKids, JustFab and ShoeDazzle Settles Deception Charges
Refunds for consumers duped into signing up for “VIP” memberships.