Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
| Case Name (Date) |
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc. 21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y. (Sept. 2021) |
|---|---|
| Product/Service | Chicco KitFit booster seats |
| Allegations | Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t |
| Status | Pending |
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Brooklyn Film Festival: Something to Offend Everyone
BFF has a course on sharing new POVs without your friends getting PO’d.
Ulta Beauty
Sometimes not even the “pretty fine print” has the answers consumers are looking for.
Bravecto
Pet parents might be ticked off by this ad.
A Lullaby of Deception
For Mike Huckabee’s next trick, a supplement that is “clinically proven” to help users fall asleep, stay asleep and wake up refreshed.
The 2022 Benefits Helpline
How helpful is this helpline?