Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Kouvr Fashion
Don’t be fooled by this website.
Verizon Super Bowl FanFest
Verizon Super Bowl FanFest is hitting 30 cities for a Super Bowl experience like no other. You In?
Magic Styler’s Refund Policy
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
FTC Proposes New Rule Targeting Deceptive Income Claims in MLM Industry
Proposed new earnings claim rule comes three years after TINA.org comment to FTC.
Period Stigma and the Deceptive Marketing of Menstrual Products
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.