Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
HelloFraud: TINA.org Files Complaint against Meal Kit Giant
False promises of “free meals” lead consumers to never-ending subscriptions.
M&Ms Imposter Car Wrap Scam
TINA.org puts the brakes on car wrap scam.
GMC AT4 Trucks and SUVs: ‘Premium and Capable’
TINA.org reader flags “ultimate apples to oranges” comparison.
Ratings for Priceline’s Secret Hotel Express Deals
Dueling and potentially confusing hotel ratings muddy deals.
CATrends: Buy Now, Pay Later Services Send Users Further Into Debt
The result is that BNPL services that are advertised as free aren’t, class-action lawsuits allege.