Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Monetizing Minors: Aneliese German (aka Lisi Shops)
What’s this kidfluencer doing promoting a “youth cream”?
This Secretive Company Built An Empire By Hawking Bad Financial And Health Advice On Facebook
Emily Baker-White, Forbes
Instaflex Advanced
Can this joint supplement back up its stiff promises?
Renewal by Andersen’s ‘Made in USA’ Window Dressing
TINA.org files FTC complaint against company.
Ariat’s WorkHog Patriot Boots
Don’t let the American flags fool you.