Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Factor: 50% Off Your First Box
Unboxing this meal kit company’s enticing offer.
Perimenopause is the new buzzword in the business of women’s health
Sarah Todd, Stat News
Will Walmart Ever Take Responsibility for Deception on Its Site?
TINA.org finds more of the same – and then some – from retail giant.
Amazon to Pay $2.5 Billion to Settle Trickery Charges Related to Prime
FTC lawsuit alleged company duped consumers into signing up and then made it hard to cancel.
Memory Defender
Your best defense against deceptive AI? A little research.