Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
Haniix’s Non-Prescription Colored Contact Lenses
Why wearing these products can be a prescription for disaster.
Wells & Monroe Charleston
Who’s actually behind this purported local boutique?
MyIQ.com
A hidden subscription is just the start.
How Ethos Sold Wall Street on AI While Powering an Analog Boiler Room
Jenny Ahn, Michelle Cera, Ruth Reader, Hunterbrook
CATrends: Unscented Deodorants and Antiperspirants
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.