Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
HydroJug’s Heat-Retention Claims
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?
With Personalized Pricing, Disclosure Is a Start, But Not a Finish Line
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.
MLMs Are Consistently Leaving Participants Behind
New book explores why MLMs are often associated with harmful outcomes – and what can be done about it.
Bytech America’s Made in USA Claims
Marketing and reality are not in sync.
CATrends: Chips Made with Avocado Oil
New study opens the floodgates to class-action litigation.