Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Jimenez et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-7933, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco KitFit booster seats
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that the booster seats provide protection in side-impact collisions when they don’t
Status
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.artsanaboosterseatsettlement.com/
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
2026 Deceptive Ad Trends
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
Why ‘Click-to-Cancel’ Still Matters – and Why the FTC Should Try Again
The problem hasn’t gone away.
Amazon’s Great Holiday Climb
Why parents may need to be called in to this Roblox game rated 13+.
Interior Icons’ 10-Year Warranty and 365-Day Returns
Taking advantage of these perks may be harder than advertised.
TINA.org’s Year in Review 2025
Looking back at our accomplishments