Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Car Seats
Case Name (Date)
Seidl et al. v. Chicco USA, Inc.
22-cv-2586, E.D. Penn.
(July 2022)
Product/Service
Certain Chicco car seats
Allegations
Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals, such as flame retardants and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been linked to several health issues
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds, having been side-impact tested, and providing protection in side-impact collisions when such claims are not true
The Latest
US Cellular: ‘Four Free Phones and Four Lines for $90’
What you need to know about this offer.
Monetizing Minors: Aneliese German (aka Lisi Shops)
What’s this kidfluencer doing promoting a “youth cream”?
This Secretive Company Built An Empire By Hawking Bad Financial And Health Advice On Facebook
Emily Baker-White, Forbes
Instaflex Advanced
Can this joint supplement back up its stiff promises?
Renewal by Andersen Reported for Making Deceptive Made in USA Claims
MADISON, CONN. July 1, 2025 – Renewal by Andersen, which bills itself as “one of largest replacement window companies in the country,” is deceptively marketing its products as Made in…