Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Splash Refresher Sparkling Water
Products contain some surprising ingredients for a drink advertised as “like water.”
One Mom’s Goal to Buy American-made Products Can Teach Us All Something
CBS News
FTC Files for Injunction as IML Shuts Down
Agency worries MLM defendants are dissipating assets.
Meet the Law Firm Driving a Surge in ‘Made in America’ Advertising Suits
Patrick Coffee, The Wall Street Journal
MaxAI
Web extension may be better at maxing out your credit card than the full capabilities of AI.