Class Action

Walgreen Glucosamine Supplements

Class Action

Walgreen Glucosamine Supplements

March 2015: A federal judge granted final approval of the revised settlement agreement.

January 2015: The parties to the lawsuit renegotiated the settlement agreement and filed an amended agreement in court. The amended agreement prohibits the defendants from conveying the message that its supplements can repair, strengthen, or rebuild cartilage (and is no longer limited to six specific words but rather extends to synonymous language as well). The duration of the injunctive relief was also amended: Instead of expiring after two years, the injunction continues in perpetuity (until and unless the defendants become aware of scientific evidence to substantiate the preexisting cartilage claims and the Court allows them to reinstate the banned language).

November 2014: TINA.org filed a brief as (Latin for “friend of the courts.”) A person or organization that is not a party to a lawsuit but has a significant interest in the case and offers information that may be important to the court’s determination. opposing the terms of the proposed settlement as unfair to consumers. For a summary of TINA.org’s legal efforts in this case, click here. To see TINA.org’s full brief, click here.

AARP Foundation Litigation also filed an objection to the settlement on behalf of a class member. To see the full objection, click here.

A final fairness hearing is scheduled for February 6, 2015.

August 2014: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement of this class-action lawsuit, which, if given final approval, will also resolve seven other lawsuits making the same allegations. To learn more about each case, click on the case information below.

A Final Approval Hearing is scheduled for December 12, 2014.

May 2014: The parties in a class-action lawsuit against Walgreen, Walmart, and Supervalu for allegedly deceptively labeling their glucosamine supplements moved for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2012, alleged that the companies deceptively advertise that their glucosamine supplements will “rebuild cartilage,” among other things, without scientific evidence to support such claims. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase are eligible to receive a full refund of the receipt price for every product purchased (class members without proof of purchase may receive a $12 refund for up to eight products). The companies also agreed to stop using six specific words (i.e., “rebuilding,” “renewing,” “regrowing,” “growing,” “adding,” and “regenerating) on the product labels and add the language “individual results may vary” for a period of 2 years. (Quinn et al v. Walgreen Co., Case No. 12-cv-08187, S. D. NY.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding glucosamine supplements and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Walgreen Co. and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

 


Class-Action Tracker

Walgreens’ Infants’ Pain & Fever Acetaminophen

Class Action

Walgreens’ Infants’ Pain & Fever Acetaminophen

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing its infants’ product as specifically formulated for infants and different from its Children’s Pain & Fever Acetaminophen Oral Suspension when both medications contain the same amount and…

Store-Brand Hand Sanitizers

Class Action

Store-Brand Hand Sanitizers

A class-action lawsuit was filed against Vi-Jon for allegedly falsely marketing that store-brand hand sanitizers – including Equate, Up & Up, Walgreens, and Germ-X – “Kill[] 99.99% of germs” when,…

Advertised Prices at Walgreens

Class Action

Advertised Prices at Walgreens

In August 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreens for allegedly charging consumers more than the advertised price of merchandise. For example, plaintiffs claim that the store charged $1.80…

Walgreens Acetaminophen Medications

Class Action

Walgreens Acetaminophen Medications

In August 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreens for allegedly misleadingly marketing Infants’ Dye-Free Pain & Fever Acetaminophen and Children’s Dye-Free Pain & Fever Acetaminophen as different products…

Several Store-Brand Hand Sanitizers

Class Action

Several Store-Brand Hand Sanitizers

In July 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Vi-Jon, Inc. for allegedly falsely advertising that germ-X and several store-brand hand sanitizers – including CVS Health, equate (Walmart), and Walgreens…

Nice! Honey Graham Crackers

Class Action

Nice! Honey Graham Crackers

In February 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreens for allegedly misleadingly marketing Nice! Honey Graham Crackers. Specifically, the complaint claims that the retailer misleadingly represents that the main…

Lang Pharma Nutrition’s CoQ-10 Softgels

Class Action

Lang Pharma Nutrition’s CoQ-10 Softgels

In July 2018, a state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit filed against Lang Pharma Nutrition (a company that supplies retailers with CoQ-10 supplements to sell under…

Finest Nutrition Glucosamine Sulfate Supplements

Class Action

Finest Nutrition Glucosamine Sulfate Supplements

In August 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreen Co. for allegedly falsely marketing Finest Nutrition glucosamine sulfate dietary supplements as containing 1000mg of glucosamine sulfate when, according to…

Several Brands of Flushable Wipes

Class Action

Several Brands of Flushable Wipes

In December 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against several manufacturers of flushable wipes – specifically, Costco, CVS, Kimberly-Clark, Procter & Gamble, Target, Walgreens, and Walmart – for allegedly falsely…

Theranos’s Blood Tests Using Edison Devices

Class Action

Theranos’s Blood Tests Using Edison Devices

June 2017: A federal judge dismissed the claims in the consolidated action. Some of the claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. while…

Good Delish® Food Products

Class Action

Good Delish® Food Products

October 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed. March 2015: A class-action…

Walgreen Supplements

Class Action

Walgreen Supplements

July 2014: After a global settlement was reached, this action was administratively closed with the consent of the parties. For more information about the settlement, click here. August 2013: A…

Walgreens Ear Pain Relief and Ear Ache Drops

Class Action

Walgreens Ear Pain Relief and Ear Ache Drops

January 2015: A federal judge granted the parties’ joint motion for dismissal. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. February 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit alleging…


The Latest

Filters


Show More