Truth In Advertising - Logo

Class Action

Vitaminwater

Class Action

Vitaminwater

Share

June 2015: After a class member filed a Notice of Appeal indicating that he was appealing the Court’s final approval of the settlement agreement and the approval of attorneys’ fees, the parties agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice (meaning that the appeal cannot be refiled). The terms of the dismissal have not been disclosed and are believed to be confidential. (Volz et al v. Coca-Cola Company, et al, Case No. 15-3443, 6th Cir.)

March 2015: After a final fairness hearing was held in December 2014, a federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.

October 2014: TINA.org filed a brief as (Latin for “friend of the courts.”) A person or organization that is not a party to a lawsuit but has a significant interest in the case and offers information that may be important to the court’s determination. opposing the terms of the proposed settlement. For a summary of TINA.org’s legal efforts in this case, click here. To see TINA.org’s full brief, click here.

August 2014: A settlement in a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Coca-Cola and Energy Brands, Inc. was preliminarily approved. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2010, alleges, among other things, that the companies market Vitaminwater as a healthy beverage containing “vitamins + water” when, in reality, the primary ingredient in the beverage is sugar and nutrients consist of less than 0.5% of its content. According to the settlement terms, the companies agreed to stop using certain phrases, such as “vitamins + water = what’s in your hand” and “vitamins + water = all you need,” and to state the amount of calories per bottle, all of which the companies had already done before the settlement was reached. The settlement does not provide class members with any type of monetary relief, but awards attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1.2 million. This settlement, if given final approval, will also resolve four other class-actions filed against Coca-Cola for its deceptive marketing of Vitaminwater.

  • Cook et al v. The Coca-Cola et al, Case No. 10-cv-61621, S. D. FL.;
  • Squiabro et al v. The Coca-Cola Co. et al, Case No. 10-cv-118, D. V.I.;
  • Bridges et al v. The Coca-Cola Co. et al, Case No. 13-cv-644, W. D. MO.; and
  • Khaleel et al v. Coca Cola Co. et al, Case No. 11-cv-471, N. D. IL.

(Volz et al v. The Coca Cola Company and Energy Brands, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-00879, S. D. OH.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding Vitaminwater and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.

For more information about sugar and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

 

Legal Action

Vitaminwater

Vitaminwater

TINA.org objected — as amicus curiae — to class-action settlements that sought to resolve claims filed against Coca-Cola and its subsidiary Glacéau alleging that the companies falsely advertised Vitaminwater as…

Class-Action Tracker

Simply Tropical Juices

Class Action

Simply Tropical Juices

Allegations: Falsely marketing juices as “All Natural” when they contain synthetic chemicals that are harmful to people and the environment

Powerade

Class Action

Powerade

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that products contain “50% more electrolytes* vs the leading sports drink”

Minute Maid Juice Boxes

Class Action

Minute Maid Juice Boxes

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing juices as healthy when scientific evidence shows consuming fruit juices increases the risk of diseases

Minute Maid Apple Juice

Class Action

Minute Maid Apple Juice

Allegations: Marketing products using the phrase “with vitamin C” on the front label without adequately disclosing that they contain a chemically modified form of vitamin C that acts as a…

Fairlife Milk

Class Action

Fairlife Milk

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that milk comes from cows that are treated humanely

The Latest

Filters

Show More