Telebrands “Everyday Savings” Program
Allegations: Failing to tell customers who purchased products that they would be enrolled in its “Everyday Savings” program
Various Types of Pocket Hoses
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Telebrands in April 2016. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the company misrepresents that various types of Pocket Hoses – including the Pocket Hose, Pocket Hose Dura-Rib, Pocket Hose Top Brass, and Pocket Hose Ultra – are strong, durable, and long-lasting when they actually are predisposed to leaking, bursting, seeping, and dripping. The lawsuit was transferred from state court to federal court in June 2016. (Memoli et al v. Telebrands, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-3347, D. NJ.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding Pocket Hoses and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Telebrands Free Bonus Product Claims
In August 2017, a state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement resolving the claims in a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Telebrands. The October 2014 complaint alleges that the company…
Amish Secret Handmade Wood Polish
In June 2017, a state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Telebrands Corp. The complaint, which was originally filed in March 2016, alleges…
Grassology
In June 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Telebrands Corp. and Moulton Logistics Management for allegedly deceptively advertising Grassology (a “breakthrough” alternative to traditional grass seed) by “Guarantee[ing] to…
Pocket Hoses
March 2017: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement. November 2016: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Telebrands. The complaint…
The Latest
Can’t Keep a Bad Ad Man Down
Why can’t the FTC put some hucksters out of business for good?