J.Crew
TINA.org investigated price advertising tactics used by outlet stores in Connecticut, including at a J.Crew Factory store, and found that it ran perpetual – and therefore fabricated and deceptive –…
November 2017: The case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
May 2017: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
December 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against J. Crew for allegedly representing products on the Factory website are sold at significant discounts when, according to the complaint, products are designed for the Factory website and they are actually being sold at their ordinary retail price. (The complaint was amended in May 2017.) (Delman et al v. J. Crew Group, Inc., J. Crew International, Inc., and Millard Drexler, Case No. 16-cv-9219, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about pricing discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
TINA.org investigated price advertising tactics used by outlet stores in Connecticut, including at a J.Crew Factory store, and found that it ran perpetual – and therefore fabricated and deceptive –…
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing pricing discounts
Allegations: Deceptively advertising sales
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising sales on its Factory website and in its Factory retail stores
May 2018: The same named plaintiff filed a lawsuit making similar allegations in a California state court. (Press v. J. Crew Group Inc., Case No. 2018-512503, California State Court –…
September 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been…
May 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the named plaintiff agreed to return the purchased sweaters and J. Crew…
TINA.org investigation reveals perpetual sales at outlet stores.