PayPal
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that the company keeps consumers’ personal data safe when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Vidaurre et al. v. PayPal, Inc.
22-cv-1283, N.D. Cal.
(March 2022)
PayPal’s “Pay in 4” service
Marketing the service as one that allows users to pay for purchases later with no interest or fees without disclosing the risk that they will incur multiple overdraft fees on linked bank accounts
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiff and When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. as to class members
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that the company keeps consumers’ personal data safe when it failed to do so and there was a data breach
Allegations: Failing to disclose the risks associated with using money transfer apps, including that consumers who lose money due to fraud will not be reimbursed
Allegations: Marketing Venmo money transfers as safe without disclosing that there is no protection for victims of fraud and no recourse for lost funds
A class-action lawsuit was filed against PayPal Credit for, among other things, allegedly engaging in bait and switch tactics by offering consumers loans and deceptively hiding the final terms of…
The result is that BNPL services that are advertised as free aren’t, class-action lawsuits allege.
Mobile payment app settles charges it misled consumers about availability of funds.
TINA.org is throwing the flag on several Big Game advertisers this year.