Class Action

Merck – Coppertone Sunscreen

Class Action

Merck – Coppertone Sunscreen

July 2013: All of the appeals were voluntarily dismissed. To see the court orders, click here and here.

April 2013: Three objectors filed Notices of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement. To see the notices, click on the links below.

March 2013: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.

September 2012: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Merck. The July 2012 complaint alleged that the company deceptively markets that Coppertone sunscreens:

  • Provide “protection from the sun’s harmful UVA and UVB rays” when, in reality, they do not provide the advertised protection;
  • Are “waterproof” and “sweatproof” when, in reality, the protection provided by the sunscreen diminished after exposure to water or sweat; and
  • Are “sunblock lotions” when, in reality, the sunscreens do not block all of the sun’s harmful rays.

According to the settlement terms, class members may receive up to $1.50 for each product purchased. Class members requesting relief for up to six products do not need proof of purchase while class members requesting relief for ten or more products must have proof of purchase (class members requesting relief for seven to nine products may be required to show proof of purchase). In addition, Merck agreed to not use the terms “sunblock,” “waterproof,” “sweatproof,” “all day,” and “all day protection” in the marketing for Coppertone sunscreens. The settlement also provides money to three cy pres recipients: Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, Legal Services of New York City, and Legal Services of New Jersey. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for February 20, 2013. (Steven Brody, et al. vs. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., Case No. 12-cv-4774, D. NJ.)

For more information about class-action lawsuits regarding sunscreens and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.

 


Class-Action Tracker

Coppertone Mineral-Based Sunscreens

Class Action

Coppertone Mineral-Based Sunscreens

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing sunscreens as mineral-based when they often contain more chemical active ingredients than mineral active ingredients

Coppertone Water Babies

Class Action

Coppertone Water Babies

Allegations: Marketing sunscreens as “safe and gentle on a baby’s skin” when they contain the carcinogen benzophenone

Coppertone Ultra Guard Sunscreens

Class Action

Coppertone Ultra Guard Sunscreens

December 2018: This action was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-2631, C. D. CA.) September 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Bayer Healthcare for, among other things, deceptively…

Coppertone Sport High Performance SPF 30

Class Action

Coppertone Sport High Performance SPF 30

A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Bayer Healthcare and Merck & Co. for allegedly misleadingly labeling Coppertone Sport High Performance SPF 30 sunscreen sprays and lotions as being…


The Latest

Filters