August 2017: The Court of Appeal of the State of California affirmed the dismissal of the case.

May 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal of this case.

February 2016: A judge dismissed this action finding that the complaint did not present any misleading representations about the products at outlet stores.

August 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Gap for allegedly using deceptive marketing practices. According to the complaint, the store deceives consumers about the quality of the items sold at its outlet stores by hiding the “Factory Store” label (this label indicates the item was made for the outlet store and is of inferior quality to the items sold at the retail stores). (Rubenstein v. The Gap Inc., Case No. BC555010, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the advertising of discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

To learn more about the deceptive advertising of sales, click here to read TINA.org’s article, The Price Is (Not Necessarily) Right.

 


Class-Action Tracker

Rewards Points on the Gap Credit Cards

Class Action

Rewards Points on the Gap Credit Cards

Allegations: Failing to disclose that the companies wipe out the rewards points customers accumulate on credit cards in certain situations, such as when credit cards are replaced due to loss…


The Latest

Filters


Show More