Enfamil and Enfamil Premature
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as safe when they are dangerous for premature infants
Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
Case Name (Date)
Palmieri et al. v. Mead Johnson & Company
20cv-9591, S.D.N.Y.
(Nov. 2020)
Product/Service
Enfagrow Premium Toddler Transitions
Allegations
Deceptively marketing products as “nutritionally appropriate” for children between nine and eighteen months when they contain less protein and more added sugar, calories, carbohydrates, and fat than is recommended for toddlers
Status
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Class-Action Tracker
Enfamil Infant Formula
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain toxic heavy metals
Enfamil Infant Formulas
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing infant formulas as “Milk-based” when the primary ingredient is a form of sugar
Enfamil Baby Formula Powders
Allegations: Products do not contain enough powder to make the advertised number of bottles
The Latest
CATrends: Toddler Formula
It’s the perfect formula for a class-action lawsuit trend.
Report: Most Advertised Baby Food Not Nutritious
New report finds issues with nutrition-related messaging.
Baby Products Under Fire for Ad Claims
Better Sleep? Natural? Baby products are facing suits for false marketing.