Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh
Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Case Name (Date)
Millam et al v. Energizer Holdings, Inc. et al
21-cv-1500, C.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2021)
Product/Service
Energizer’s AA MAX batteries
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
Monetizing Minors: Aneliese German (aka Lisi Shops)
What’s this kidfluencer doing promoting a “youth cream”?
This Secretive Company Built An Empire By Hawking Bad Financial And Health Advice On Facebook
Emily Baker-White, Forbes
Instaflex Advanced
Can this joint supplement back up its stiff promises?
Renewal by Andersen Reported for Making Deceptive Made in USA Claims
MADISON, CONN. July 1, 2025 – Renewal by Andersen, which bills itself as “one of largest replacement window companies in the country,” is deceptively marketing its products as Made in…
Renewal by Andersen’s ‘Made in USA’ Window Dressing
TINA.org files FTC complaint against company.